"Trust me, this will take time but there is order here, very faint, very human. Meander if you want to get to town."- M. Ondaatje
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
what we lost
The interior love poem
the deeper levels of the self
dates when the abandonment
of certain principles occurred
The role of courtesy-how to enter
a forest, how to touch
a master's feet before lesson or performance
The art of the drum. The art of eye-painting
How to cut an arrow. Gestures between lovers.
The pattern of teeth marks on skin
drawn by a monk from memory
The limits of betrayal. The five ways
a lover could mock an ex-lover
The skill in tentative messages
which included yes and no
but never the direct maybe
Nine finger and eye gestures
to signal key emotions
The small boats of solitude
Lyrics that rose
from love
back into air
naked with guile
and praise
Our works and days
We knew how monsoons
(south-west, north-east)
would govern behaviour
and when to discover
the knowledge of the dead
hidden in clouds
in rivers, in unbroken rock
All this was burnt
or traded for power and wealth
from the eight compass points of vengeance
from the two levels of envy
by michael ondaatje
snow
More snow, about 20 inches over the last two days and the world is gleaming white. What I do like is skidding about in the powder, packing it into hard crunchy balls and dumping it down someone's front.
So much snow that the skylight above the library is permanently clouded.
Monday, March 19, 2007
doofus
nb. this is not saying that men are bastards, which is also true but not relevant here. This post just refers to the 'doofus' quotient that all men are born with.
Thursday, March 15, 2007
back then
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
summer
Monday, March 12, 2007
mandela
is not that we are inadequate.
Our deepest fear
is that we are
powerful beyond measure.
It is our light, not our darkness,
that most frightens us.
We ask ourselves, who am I to be brilliant,
gorgeous, talented and fabulous?
Actually, who are you not to be?
You are a child of God.
Your playing small doesn't serve this world.
There's nothing enlightened about shrinking
so that other people won't feel insecure around you.
We were born to make manifest the glory of God
that is within us;
It is not just in some of us - it's in everyone
And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people
permission to do the same.
As we are liberated from our own fear,
our presence automatically liberates others
Nelson Mandela, Inaugural Speech
Friday, March 09, 2007
the life of a graduate student
Alarm goes off at 7:30am. Flail wildly to hit the damn thing off. Fall out of bed, stagger into the bathroom. Spend long time examining toes on the toilet seat. Stare into mirror. Note bags under eyes expanding slowly. Hair unkempt. Shove toothbrush into my mouth while pondering the latest dilemma on Grey’s Anatomy. Is Addison to be pitied or hated? Secretly acknowledge that want to be Addison. Shower briefly. As housemate said, the only thing I achieve with any regularity every day is keeping my ass clean.
Emerge from bathroom clean if not exactly shiny. Walk from bathroom to room seems like an arctic corridor. Its -15 deg Celsius outside. Wash one bowl in the overflowing sink harrumphing at slovenliness of housemates (including me). Pour whatever cereal there is from multiple boxes. Milk is slightly off but decide not to think about it. Chow down in 4 minutes flat. Open door to room. Now that I can see properly (without haze of sleep blinding me), my room has been the victim of a nuclear holocaust. Luckily I wasn’t there while it happened, or else I might be dead.
Head out door 8am. Head down to avoid the gigantic sheet of ice that has formed outside house and leads all the way to the train station. Descend 20 storeys into train station. As usual on my train, there’s Alfie, the drunk guy who catches the same train every day and has the same things to say: Clinton is a pervert! Thank God we have Bush in da House!. I look at the ads in the train. Someone will pay 200 dollars to me if they can study my sleep habits for a month.
8:37am Arrive at school. Race to get a coffee jostling the 100 other sleepy-eyed students trying to get a coffee before first class. Hah! They don’t call me Singaporean for nothing! Get coffee, inhale deeply and race into class. As usual professor is on time, looking as though he has been up for hours, which in fact, he has. Bust out the laptop and check email. Nothing from my friends! Losers! How do they deserve friend status if they can’t even email me! Check the popular news and blog sites. Ponder what I am going to do over the summer. Check briefly what lecturer is talking about. Oh right the F test which tests for joint significance of variables in a multivariate regression ruling out heteroskedasticity. I have no idea what this means. I also fail to understand why a word such as heteroskedasticity exists in the English language. Professor mentions that we have a test next week. I sit up! A test! How come no one told me about this before? Deeply resent the lack of notice until friend tells me everyone knew about it 2 months ago. If I had attended class I might have known.
Finally the class, which seems interminable is over. It’s my first and last class for the day. Its 10am. And my day has just started, once the pesky classes are over.
Oh the life of a graduate student.
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
temp.
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
conference
Monday, March 05, 2007
walking away.
Friday, March 02, 2007
tired.
Monday, February 26, 2007
ghosts
"She pushed the sheet down to the foot of the bed and lay there in the darkened room, facing the waves of air. The island no longer held her by the past. She'd spent the fifteen years since ignoring that early celebrity. Anil had read documents and news reports, full of tragedy, and she had now lived abroad long enough to interpret Sri Lanka with a long-distance gaze. But here it was a more complicated world morally. The streets were still streets, the citizens remained citizens. They shopped, changed jobs, laughed. Yet the darkest Greek tragedies were innocent compared with what was happening here. Heads on stakes. Skeletons dug out of a cocoa pit in Matale. At university Anil had translated lines from Archilochus — In the hospitality of war we left them their dead to remember us by. But here there was no such gesture to the families of the dead, not even the information of who the enemy was. " excerpt from anil's ghost
it's true. it's all so heartbreakingly true.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
breakfast with the FT
By Shawn Donnan
Published: February 23 2007 15:16 Last updated: February 23 2007 15:16
The concerned volunteer handling John Wood's Hong Kong public relations says that my suggestion of breakfast at the newly refurbished Mandarin Oriental might seem distasteful to the head of a charity.
So on a Saturday morning – at an hour too early to be called brunch – I walk into the cloud of stale beer and cigarette fug that is the main bar of the Foreign Correspondents' Club in central Hong Kong. A few nights earlier, a proud member described this place as a club for "drunks, cheapskates and losers". Is this a more appropriate venue to meet a man who likes to think of himself as the Andrew Carnegie of the developing world?
I settle on a banquette in the glass-enclosed "no smoking" bunker and order a coffee. When a smiling Wood strolls in, he looks unperturbed by our surroundings.
Wood, a former Microsoft executive turned social entrepreneur, has plenty of reasons to be cheerful. This is a good time for a global tour in support of a book called Leaving Microsoft to Change the World. New hedge-fund fortunes are being made; Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are deploying billions to address the world's ills; and celebrities - from Brad and Angelina and Bono downwards – are working away at good causes. Philanthropy is hot.
Wood's work has acquired an earnest fashionability of late, but it wasn't always that way. He left his Beijing-based Microsoft job in 1998 to found a charity called Room to Read, conceived as a way to get used books to the developing world.
The move prompted raised eyebrows among his colleagues, while his luxury-hotel-loving girlfriend soon became his ex-girlfriend. "I can still remember the days when I would check my e-mail and hit the refresh button four times and be like 'Damn it! My mail's not working. No one's e-mailing me.' There was just nothing going on," he says.
\nWood now gets 300 e-mails a day from strangers eager to get involved in Room to Read. The charity has expanded and builds schools and libraries, gives scholarships for girls' education, and publishes local-language children's books in countries such as Cambodia, India and Nepal. Not satisfied with styling himself as the Carnegie of the developing world, Wood says he also wants to be its Dr Seuss.\n\nHe works longer hours and travels more than he did when he was at Microsoft. He also applies plenty of what he refers to in his book as Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's "get shit done" ethos to a charity world "immune from market pressures".\n\n"I think the charity world has been kind of given a free pass - 'Oh, they're trying hard' [or] 'oh they mean well.' But they're not well-run," he says. "In business there is always a market mechanism. If you [the FT] lose readers you guys go out of business. If Microsoft annoys people they are going to switch to Apple. And in the charity world that doesn't really necessarily happen."\n\nOver breakfast of scrambled eggs and pancakes, the word emerging most frequently from Wood's mouth seems to be "scaleable". There is plenty of talk of "metrics" and "return on investment", of branding and "market gaps". He wants Room to Read to be "the single trusted global brand for education in the developing world". And he plans to do that by creating an organisation melding "the compassion of Mother Teresa" with "the focus and tenacity of a blue-chip company like a GE or a Cisco".\n\nWood is obsessed with putting to work the business practices he learnt at Microsoft. He requires all Room to Read staff to include the latest quarterly measures of progress in their e-mail signature files, largely because "at Microsoft, Ballmer used to always say 'what gets measured gets done'".\n\nHe has an entrepreneur's obsession with costs, and relies on the kindness of powerful donors and old-fashioned penny-pinching to keep expenditure down. He travels around the world on frequent-flier miles amassed by "a senior figure at Goldman Sachs". To arrange fundraising events he draws on volunteer chapters in San Francisco (where the charity is based), and other cities such as London, New York and Hong Kong. As a policy, he refuses to recruit expensive expatriates to run local field offices.\n",1]
);
//-->
Wood now gets 300 e-mails a day from strangers eager to get involved in Room to Read. The charity has expanded and builds schools and libraries, gives scholarships for girls' education, and publishes local-language children's books in countries such as Cambodia, India and Nepal. Not satisfied with styling himself as the Carnegie of the developing world, Wood says he also wants to be its Dr Seuss.
He works longer hours and travels more than he did when he was at Microsoft. He also applies plenty of what he refers to in his book as Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's "get shit done" ethos to a charity world "immune from market pressures".
"I think the charity world has been kind of given a free pass - 'Oh, they're trying hard' [or] 'oh they mean well.' But they're not well-run," he says. "In business there is always a market mechanism. If you [the FT] lose readers you guys go out of business. If Microsoft annoys people they are going to switch to Apple. And in the charity world that doesn't really necessarily happen."
Over breakfast of scrambled eggs and pancakes, the word emerging most frequently from Wood's mouth seems to be "scaleable". There is plenty of talk of "metrics" and "return on investment", of branding and "market gaps". He wants Room to Read to be "the single trusted global brand for education in the developing world". And he plans to do that by creating an organisation melding "the compassion of Mother Teresa" with "the focus and tenacity of a blue-chip company like a GE or a Cisco".
Wood is obsessed with putting to work the business practices he learnt at Microsoft. He requires all Room to Read staff to include the latest quarterly measures of progress in their e-mail signature files, largely because "at Microsoft, Ballmer used to always say 'what gets measured gets done'".
He has an entrepreneur's obsession with costs, and relies on the kindness of powerful donors and old-fashioned penny-pinching to keep expenditure down. He travels around the world on frequent-flier miles amassed by "a senior figure at Goldman Sachs". To arrange fundraising events he draws on volunteer chapters in San Francisco (where the charity is based), and other cities such as London, New York and Hong Kong. As a policy, he refuses to recruit expensive expatriates to run local field offices.
\nWood has a marketer's knack for laying out his achievements in a way that appeals to the global-oriented business class he and Room to Read target in their fundraising. The charity's pace of growth, Wood boasts, is faster than Starbucks'. In the sixth year after its initial public offering of shares, Wood says, Starbucks opened 500 new outlets, while Room to Read in its sixth year opened more than 1,000 school libraries.\n\n"I don't meant to be flippant about the Carnegie analogy," he adds later, "but we've now done more libraries in the developing world than Carnegie did in the US."\nAndrew Carnegie, the Scottish-born magnate turned philanthropist, built 2,500 libraries around the US. By the end of 2006, Room to Read had opened 3,300 libraries, and expects to have 5,000 by the end of this year. That number is expected to grow by a further 40 per cent, to 7,000 by the end of 2008. In coming years Room to Read expects to open an average of "30 libraries a week across the developing world".\n\nWood turned to philanthropy after a 1998 trekking holiday in Nepal. He visited a remote school with just a few books and, without much forethought, promised to return with reading materials for the children. An e-mail he sent to friends yielded hundreds of used books and when, months later, he returned to the school with his father and a donkey train loaded with books he was so moved by the reaction that he decided to change careers. This has since grown into his ambition to "democratise philanthropy".\n\n"What do you mean by that?" I ask, between bites of undercooked pancake.\n"I mean basically saying to the world [that] you don't have to be Gates or Buffett, [and] you don't have to be as good-looking as Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt to go help Africa. What we are trying to say is, it does not cost much to go make this change. It's $250 to underwrite a girl's scholarship. It's $2,000 in total to do a library. It's somewhere in the $10,000-15,000 range to endow a school. And I think if we really want to reach our long-term goal - which is to reach at least 10 million kids [by 2020] - we can't really necessarily depend on the fact that someone rich, someone really super-rich or really super-famous will do it for us."\n",1]
);
//-->
Wood has a marketer's knack for laying out his achievements in a way that appeals to the global-oriented business class he and Room to Read target in their fundraising. The charity's pace of growth, Wood boasts, is faster than Starbucks'. In the sixth year after its initial public offering of shares, Wood says, Starbucks opened 500 new outlets, while Room to Read in its sixth year opened more than 1,000 school libraries.
"I don't meant to be flippant about the Carnegie analogy," he adds later, "but we've now done more libraries in the developing world than Carnegie did in the US."
Andrew Carnegie, the Scottish-born magnate turned philanthropist, built 2,500 libraries around the US. By the end of 2006, Room to Read had opened 3,300 libraries, and expects to have 5,000 by the end of this year. That number is expected to grow by a further 40 per cent, to 7,000 by the end of 2008. In coming years Room to Read expects to open an average of "30 libraries a week across the developing world".
Wood turned to philanthropy after a 1998 trekking holiday in Nepal. He visited a remote school with just a few books and, without much forethought, promised to return with reading materials for the children. An e-mail he sent to friends yielded hundreds of used books and when, months later, he returned to the school with his father and a donkey train loaded with books he was so moved by the reaction that he decided to change careers. This has since grown into his ambition to "democratise philanthropy".
"What do you mean by that?" I ask, between bites of undercooked pancake.
"I mean basically saying to the world [that] you don't have to be Gates or Buffett, [and] you don't have to be as good-looking as Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt to go help Africa. What we are trying to say is, it does not cost much to go make this change. It's $250 to underwrite a girl's scholarship. It's $2,000 in total to do a library. It's somewhere in the $10,000-15,000 range to endow a school. And I think if we really want to reach our long-term goal - which is to reach at least 10 million kids [by 2020] - we can't really necessarily depend on the fact that someone rich, someone really super-rich or really super-famous will do it for us."
\nA flaky charity world isn't the only target for Wood's criticism. He is unimpressed, too, by some corporate social-responsibility programmes. He has had "very deep, very thoughtful" conversations with some companies, but is scathing of others that use CSR as little more than an addendum to their marketing budget. "I've definitely seen the companies that take out half-page ads in the FT, The Economist or Time, bragging about what good corporate citizens they are. And I'm like, 'Huh, that's interesting, I've never actually seen anything that you've done in the developing world and I've filled five passports with travel.'"\n\nWood argues that, by under-investing in the developing world, many first-world companies are guilty of short-sightedness. Greater corporate investment in education in impoverished countries would not be an entirely selfless act, he says. Better education would yield more affluent societies and, eventually, faster global economic growth and bigger corporate profits.\n\nHe also argues that, as the Bush administration's actions in Iraq and elsewhere are making the US progressively more unpopular in the world, businesses and charities like his are being forced into "freelance diplomacy" or "freelance foreign relations".\n\nBut his biggest concern is over what he calls the "Gates conundrum". With their moves into philanthropy, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have set a new standard for the world's super-rich, and Wood predicts that billions more will be thrown at non-governmental organisations in the coming decades.\n\nYet the charity world, he says, has a poor record of being able to absorb donations and grow quickly. "If you look across Africa there's just such a dearth of scaleable models for social change. I think in the next couple of decades that's one of the main challenges for the philanthropic world - can you teach these NGOs to build capacity and to scale?" Many groups erect one or two orphanages at a time, but in Africa "the HIV/Aids problem is such that you basically need a scaleable model for orphanages. You literally need someone to be the Starbucks of orphanages."\n",1]
);
//-->
A flaky charity world isn't the only target for Wood's criticism. He is unimpressed, too, by some corporate social-responsibility programmes. He has had "very deep, very thoughtful" conversations with some companies, but is scathing of others that use CSR as little more than an addendum to their marketing budget. "I've definitely seen the companies that take out half-page ads in the FT, The Economist or Time, bragging about what good corporate citizens they are. And I'm like, 'Huh, that's interesting, I've never actually seen anything that you've done in the developing world and I've filled five passports with travel.'"
Wood argues that, by under-investing in the developing world, many first-world companies are guilty of short-sightedness. Greater corporate investment in education in impoverished countries would not be an entirely selfless act, he says. Better education would yield more affluent societies and, eventually, faster global economic growth and bigger corporate profits.
He also argues that, as the Bush administration's actions in Iraq and elsewhere are making the US progressively more unpopular in the world, businesses and charities like his are being forced into "freelance diplomacy" or "freelance foreign relations".
But his biggest concern is over what he calls the "Gates conundrum". With their moves into philanthropy, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have set a new standard for the world's super-rich, and Wood predicts that billions more will be thrown at non-governmental organisations in the coming decades.
Yet the charity world, he says, has a poor record of being able to absorb donations and grow quickly. "If you look across Africa there's just such a dearth of scaleable models for social change. I think in the next couple of decades that's one of the main challenges for the philanthropic world - can you teach these NGOs to build capacity and to scale?" Many groups erect one or two orphanages at a time, but in Africa "the HIV/Aids problem is such that you basically need a scaleable model for orphanages. You literally need someone to be the Starbucks of orphanages."
\nIf the current giants of the philanthropic world succeed in preventing vast numbers of infant deaths in the developing world, they will also create a potentially overwhelming long-term challenge for already struggling governments and NGOs. "If those kids get to be the age of five, let's say, then how are they going to thrive?" Wood asks. "To thrive they need access to clean water and they need access to education... We've got five years to get ahead of Gates and Buffett on this issue and to me the clock is ticking."\n\nAs our allotted time is also about to run out, the conversation turns to lighter things, meandering around Wood's lack of executive stock options (he says he now gets "karmic options"); his Microsoft shares ("still my single largest holding") and the philanthropic habits of the new hedge-fund titans ("right now they are still in the wealth-creation mode [but] at some point, hopefully they will get to the wealth-deployment mode").\n\nAnd then Wood is off, heading back to his hotel - I decide not to ask if it is the Mandarin - for a work-out before a book signing. A few days later he is off to Cambodia and then on to London for the UK launch of his book. I, meanwhile, wander back out into the bar to secure a receipt I will eventually lose, leaving me unable to claim our breakfast on FT expenses - a little bit of unintentional philanthropy.\n\nShawn Donnan is the FT's Asia companies editor.\n............................................................................\nThe Foreign Correspondents' Club, Hong Kong\n\n1 x filter coffee\n\n1 x latte\n\n1 x double espresso\n\n2 x San Pellegrino\n\n1 x scrambled eggs with bacon\n\n1 x hotcakes with strawberries\n\nTotal: HK$160\n\n",1]
);
//-->
If the current giants of the philanthropic world succeed in preventing vast numbers of infant deaths in the developing world, they will also create a potentially overwhelming long-term challenge for already struggling governments and NGOs. "If those kids get to be the age of five, let's say, then how are they going to thrive?" Wood asks. "To thrive they need access to clean water and they need access to education... We've got five years to get ahead of Gates and Buffett on this issue and to me the clock is ticking."
As our allotted time is also about to run out, the conversation turns to lighter things, meandering around Wood's lack of executive stock options (he says he now gets "karmic options"); his Microsoft shares ("still my single largest holding") and the philanthropic habits of the new hedge-fund titans ("right now they are still in the wealth-creation mode [but] at some point, hopefully they will get to the wealth-deployment mode").
And then Wood is off, heading back to his hotel - I decide not to ask if it is the Mandarin - for a work-out before a book signing. A few days later he is off to Cambodia and then on to London for the UK launch of his book. I, meanwhile, wander back out into the bar to secure a receipt I will eventually lose, leaving me unable to claim our breakfast on FT expenses - a little bit of unintentional philanthropy.
Shawn Donnan is the FT's Asia companies editor.
............................................................................
The Foreign Correspondents' Club, Hong Kong
1 x filter coffee
1 x latte
1 x double espresso
2 x San Pellegrino
1 x scrambled eggs with bacon
1 x hotcakes with strawberries
Total: HK$160
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
leadership guff
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
cheese!
Monday, February 19, 2007
hairdressing
Saturday, February 17, 2007
London
(I can't believe that I. Am. Going. To. London).